Early in my tasting career I loved the wines of 
Today, I opened a bottle that confirmed my thoughts about Lagler. The 2002 Steinborz Riesling Smaragd shows a dark plate gold of mature Riesling, and the nose is a bit advanced too: there is a whiff of Firne agedness, with notes of wax, honey, mushrooms (but not petrol). But the evolution is balanced by excellent minerality: first saline, later increasingly stony. Medium complexity: this doesn’t seem to have a lot of aromatic stuffing, but shows noble and terroir-driven. Palate is rather full, with little sugar, firm acidity and a firm minerality throughout, and quite some power on the finish: seemingly this could still age; it drinks very well an evening later and a day later, showing more sweet, less crisp. But I am happy to have opened it today when it is near its highest point.
While surely not disappointing for 20€, this excellent wine misses the train to greatness. Why? My answer would be: simplicity. We are not at the level of complexity of a Wachstum Bodenstein, nor the compelling texture of Pichler’s Kellerberg. It is rather a sonata than a symphony; rather a duo than a quartet. As every music lover will confirm, a good duo is perfectly fine six days a week.
From a wall in Spitz. © S.
